Sections: Divers: .
|
Inspection of CC 2092 during the de-collaring procedure (due to QH problems)
5th July 2004, Manufacturer
2. Warm magnetic measurements of collared coil 2092 (see
file)
show various red and yellow alarms in different positions in both
apertures. Since this collared coil has to be opened due to a quench heater
problem, it could be profited from the opportunity to inspect the poles of
both apertures directly instead of having a short mole measurement.
The worst alarms in aperture 1 could be seen in position 18: b3 (4.9 sigma),
b5 (6.5 sigma), b6 (6.1 sigma), b7 (5.7 sigma), b8 (11.8 sigma), b11 (6.3
sigma), b12 (10.5 sigma), b13 (5.9 sigma), b14 (5.9 sigma), a6 (8.8 sigma),
a8 (4.3 sigma), a9 (5.0 sigma), a12 (6.8 sigma). In aperture 2, the
worst spots are at position 2: b3 (4.3 sigma), b5 (4.7 sigma), b8 (5.4
sigma), b12 (5.4 sigma), b13 (5.6 sigma), b15 (4.3 sigma), at position 3: b8
(6.3 sigma), b12 (5.4 sigma), a7 (4.1 sigma), a11 (5.9 sigma), in position
8: a6 (6.1 sigma), a12 (4.8 sigma), at position 9: b8 (6.7 sigma), b12 (5.3
sigma), at position 16: a6 (6.8 sigma), a12 (5.8 sigma), at position 17: a6
(9.2 sigma), a12 (7.5 sigma), a14 (5.9 sigma), and at position 18: b5 (5.7
sigma), b7 (4 sigma), b8 (5.3 sigma), b13 (5.8 sigma), a6 (9.9 sigma), a8 (4
sigma), a12 (7.9 sigma), a14 (5.6 sigma). Fig.: Expected defect in CC 2092 is a conductor movement of block no. 6. 7th July 04, Firm 2: The collared coil 2092 undergoes the procedure of disassembling in presence of A. Musso from CERN. The collared coil was entirely disassembled and the poles were separated. The entire length of the coils have been inspected, but no defect or damage was visible. It is also remarkable that the cable was well glued along the entire length in both apertures.
| |||
Content- Christine Vollinger |